Archive for February, 2010

What to do with crap.

Friday, February 26th, 2010

The key thing on my mind this week is, “just because it’s big and it took a long time to make doesn’t mean it’s any good”. Yep, that’s right. I’m in the FUD (Fear/Uncertainty/Doubt) stage of a project.

Every project I do has roughly the same steps: an idea (which always seems brilliant at the time, but may actually prove to be lame or trite), sketches galore, planning, and actual execution. Then there’s the FUD stage. That’s where I can’t see the project objectively anymore and the fear that it’s a total, irredeemable piece of crap creeps in. Sometimes FUD hits several times.

FUD almost always strikes right after I’ve painted or otherwise rendered some image on fabric and it’s time to stitch it. Oh, lord. How in the world should I stitch this thing? Should I even bother? Will I ruin all of my hard work? Will it be improved by stitching? After all, stitching takes a loooong time and it isn’t as though every darned thing in the world has to rendered in fabric. (A worthy topic for a rant at another time.)

Fortunately, I’ve come up with a way of dealing with that issue. I throw the piece in a closet and ignore it for a few weeks or months until I’m not afraid of it anymore. When I can simply regard it as a few dollars worth of fabric with ink smeared on it, then I’m ready to work again.

Unfortunately, FUD usually strikes again after I’ve either finished the project or am close to doing so. At that point, I have so many hours invested that I can’t bear the thought that it might not be stellar. I can’t see its good and bad points, much less how to improve it. I’ll stuff it in the closet again, hoping to see it with fresh eyes at a later time. Alas, sometimes the fresh eyes don’t come until after the piece has hung at a show and I’ve seen it juxtaposed with other, much better, works.

It’s a painful cycle, but in some sense it’s okay. It comes with the territory.

I’ve read about other artists going through a similar process. A painter faced with a less-than-stellar piece may attempt to fix it or, barring that, burn it or paint over it. Work that isn’t up to snuff doesn’t make it out of the studio.

Unfortunately, because textile pieces can require a substantial time investment, there can be a mental resistance to doing the same thing. It may not even be practical to rework a piece, and the idea of burning or destroying a piece can be devastating.

I am trying to get over that. While it’s great to take pride in accomplishments, I think we also need to be okay with saying (privately, if necessary) “You know, this isn’t very good and that’s okay. I learned X, Y, and Z from it and now I’m going to go create something new.”

Toward that end, here is what I’ve been doing with some of my discarded work:

Culled fabric paintings and dye experiments –
These get cut into blocks and used as the base of scrap quilts. When I’m having an off day, I crawl to the sewing machine and make crazy blocks. For example, my first iteration of Brian at 10 Months looked like a baby zombie with radioactive eyes. Ghastly beyond belief. I cut it into 5″ squares and it’s now the basis of a bunch of batik crazy blocks. My first iteration of The Imp is now a cleaning rag.

Culled fiber pieces which are towel sized or larger -
As long as they’re fairly soft and flexible, the humane society is happy to get them. I am inexplicably cheered by the thought of a stray peeing on something I made that wasn’t very good. At least it’s doing genuine good somewhere!

Culled quilts of any size -
These are great for cutting apart into chunks or strips and serging into bookmarks or coffee cuffs. Last time I splashed a bunch of paint on them and then did some rubber stamping to disguise their origins. The resulting bookmarks turned out cheerfully obnoxious and beat the heck out of my usual bookmarks, blow-in-cards and kleenex. Next time I may try weaving serged strips into a placemat or doormat.

Now, I suppose, I’d better get back to my current FUD project. Maybe you’ll even see it at a show! That is, unless I decide that it’s crap and donate it to the humane society …

A banner day

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

Yesterday was a banner day. This blog received not one, but TWO pieces of comment spam, its very first. Isn’t that exciting? I figure this is akin a housewarming, as when one finds those first leaflets for maid services or tree trimming on the doorstep after moving into a house. It’s a sign that you’ve arrived and you’re well on the way to settling in.

This is a real blog now. The spammers say so.

New Work: My Life, Christmas Jumble

Friday, February 19th, 2010

Here are a couple of recently completed pieces. Both were inspired by the work of mid-century artist Jim Flora.

For want of a better title, I’m calling this one Christmas Jumble. I sketched the design over the holidays, so it contains lots of little images of Christmas thingamabobbies.

This piece is a good reminder of how time and distance can change one’s perception of work. Right now, we’re coasting down to the end of February and the whole notion of Christmas seems a bit stale. Bring on a couple of helpings of spring, I say! I still like the walking tree, though.

This one is My Life. It’s filled with snippets from, well, my life. The washer with the ominous staring eye, the leg lamp, the toilet which may or may not be upchucking.

Upon further reflection, this isn’t only my life but everyone’s life. When you get right down to it, who doesn’t have to cope with issues like a hand popping out of a toaster?

This figure troubles me, though. What in the heck is it? I’m sure I had something really profound in mind when I drew it, but now it escapes me. The number seven attacking a couple of wadded up, used tissues? A Henry Moore sculpture? Two pelvic bones with a broken golf club? The mystery of the unknown?

That’s the beauty of art, though. It doesn’t HAVE to represent anything. Like life in general, it may not mean anything in particular and sometimes it’s hard to figure out what’s going on.

That is, unless a magazine calls for an interview. If that happens, I’ll claim that figure is an homage to Picasso’s Guernica. For all I know, I might even be telling the truth.

2010 SAQA Auction Quilt

Thursday, February 4th, 2010

Today I completed this year’s contribution to the SAQA (Studio Art Quilt Associates) benefit auction.  Come Monday, I’ll ship it off to SAQA. I hope it’ll find a good home and give someone a giggle, as well as raise some money for SAQA’s programs and exhibitions.

A slightly larger version of this piece, as well as a closeup of the main fish, can be seen here.

This piece is a result of a longstanding conviction that certain paisleys look a great deal like fish. The seeds of this obsession were planted during early childhood, when I wore a good many hand-me-downs from the late 60s and early 70s. Paisleys figured large. (I was a weird kid anyhow; my idea of a good time involved wadding up a crazy quilt and rolling a marble through the contours thus created. Wearing paisley-imprinted jersey cloth was probably a “straw that broke the camel’s back” sort of thing. That, or my aunts managed to impregnate the clothing with intoxicating rock concert fumes.)

The paisleys in this image are based on the Paisley and Paisley II fonts offered by House of Lime. After doing basic layout sketches, I rendered the piece with a Frankensteinian combination of Inktense pencils, Neocolor II pastels, and Tsukineko ink, then went nuts with the thread.

It was a fun piece to make. May it bring joy and color to whoever winds up with it.

Adventure is out there!

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010

I have edited the foo out of the template for this blog, so as to make it mesh with the rest of this site. I am probably going to have to “live” with it for awhile to see what else, if anything, I wish to change. In the meantime, if others find the layout confusing or unclear, please speak up.

Here is a gratuitous graphic so as to test the image upload end of things:

A sophomoric image from my early days of image editing.

I do love my gratuitous images! This one is called “MonaStein” for reasons which are probably evident. It’s a rather sophomoric image from early in my days of experimenting with Photoshop.